The Search for High Quality, Low Prices
Experiments and Failures in Paper Back Publishing, 1920-1938
The classic publishing houses, the Harpers, Appletons, Scribners, turned
noses up at what they saw as "trashy" or "lower quality"
writings of the Pulp Magazines and tried to convince themselves that the
pulps were appealing to a market wholly different from their own educated,
cultured readership. The gap between quality first editions and the pulps
was filled by reprint specialists such as Grosset and Dunlap and Hurst
which produced reprints on pulp-paper in hardback. But Munsey had already
proven that most people really did not care about the paper quality of
the books they were reading, so when Time Magazine complained in 1920 about
the rising costs of hardback "quality" literature and wondered
if there might be a market for first editions of talented authors in pulp
paper, more than a few alarm bells sounded in the offices of publishers.
Within a few months of Time's article, Fredrick A. Stokes Co. conducted
a test of the paperback market by simultaneously releasing Gertrude Atherton's
new novel "Sisters-in-Law" in a $2.00 cloth cover and a $1.50
paperback edition. The hardback outsold the first edition paperback by
an astonishing 54 to 1; furthermore, over one half of the paperbacks were
sold in New York, and most of those were to a single dealer hoping to get
rich. The dealer didn't, and the Stokes experiment confirmed what the traditional
publishers had been claiming all along: There was no market for quality
literature in paperback.
Another experiment had similar results. After collaborating with Collier's
to publish a paperbound Atlas, Reynolds Publishing launched a full series
of paperback titles. Saddle-stitched, sized 4 3/8" x 6 1/2",
with large 10-12 point type, 96 pages, and six-color illustrated cover,
the books managed to be dignified in appearance while abandoning the dullness
of the Riverside paperbacks without having the melodrama cheapness of the
pulps. The titles, too, represented serious literature: Dream Woman,
Wilkie Collins; A Bal Masque, Alexander Dumas; The Necklace
Guy de Maupassant; His Wedded Wife Charles Dickens, and others.
But Reynolds was never able to turn a profit, and finally abandoned the
effort.
One paperback publisher was exceptionally successful, even though his
publishing and advertising
methods were certainly outside the mainstream. Emanuel Haldemann-Julius,
an eccentric living in Missouri and avowed Communist and atheist, took
out newspaper ads in 1921 for his "University in Print", a series
of mini-mini books, 3.5x5, wrapped in paper, costing only three cents each.
He settled on a standard blue paper cover, renamed the series the "Little
Blue Books", and hit pay dirt with mail order sales. In his first
year he sold over 31 MILLION Little Blue Books. By 1925 Publisher's Weekly
proclaimed him "the greatest publishing house in history". But
his unethical advertising tactics, very shoddy publishing standards, and
politically incorrect choice of subjects kept him outside the mainstream.
Meanwhile, as publishers feared, Grosset and Dunlap began experimenting
with issuing original titles in their pulp-paper hardbacks. However, no
established author would allow his work to enter the world in such an ugly
book, so G/D's original efforts were limited to unknown authors and presented
no real threat to the establishment.
More worrisome was the effort by the Boni Brothers (who had established
the Modern Library and soon-to-be Random House). All the paperback revolutions,
they noted, relied heavily on mail orders. Of course, the nation had changed,
the farmer was no longer as isolated from cities as he had been in the
19th century, but still, they noted, Haldeman-Julius' success was in mail-order.
So they launched "Charles Boni Paper Books", a mail-order book
club. Join the club ($5.00 per year), and receive periodic mailings of
high quality literature in paper back. To lend prestige, each book was
illustrated by a renowned artist, such as Noman Rockwell and Rockwell Kent.
The Bonis had their doubts and offered, ala Stokes earlier, a cloth bound
option to subscribers. The crash of Wall Street the very year they started
doomed their efforts. They struggled for a few years without turning a
profit. The lasting influence of Boni Paper Books is less on the development
of paperbacks than on the founding of book clubs, but that's a different
story.
Another attempt at producing quality literature in paperback came from
Modern Age Books in 1931.Full-sized books, often with over three hundred
pages, they were bound in paper. The company offered three imprints: Blue
Seal Books were original titles for twenty-five cents each; Red Seal Books,
usually priced at thirty cents, were classic reprints; and Gold Seal Books,
at fifty cents, were illustrated works. Such prices seemed outrageous for
paper items, and Modern Age finally switched to hardbacks with nearly the
same retail price.
In 1933, Sam Lowe, president of Whitman Printing Company, the official
printer for Grosset & Dunlap, Walt Disney, and several pulp magazines,
including those of Dell, noticed the increasing popularity of daily newspaper
comic strips. Attempting to capitalize on this trend, he launched Big Little
Books with cartoon illustrations on the right hand page and simple text
on the left. Initially these books were hardbacks, but after 125 titles
he switched to paperback format for the next 32 titles before World War
Two ended the venture.
That was about the scope of serious paperback publishing up to the start
of the World War in Europe. But things were happening in Europe besides
the gathering of war clouds, and more than one publisher took note.
|